Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1

News
Sep.29
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.

Key Points

  • Australia will classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance from October 1, 2026.
  • The government initially proposed Schedule 7 but moved to Schedule 9 to strengthen controls over unlawful supply and possession.
  • TGA said the substance has appeared in nicotine-free or nicotine-alternative e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and is also being added to preparations such as oral pouches.
  • An Australian study tested nine nicotine-alternative vape products and found 6-methylnicotine in all nine, with concentrations reaching about 100 mg/mL.

2Firsts

September 29, 2026

Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the country's Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026.

TGA said 6-methylnicotine has been reported in several e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and advertised as nicotine-free or as nicotine alternatives. The regulator also cited evidence that the substance is being added to preparations such as oral pouches.

Australia Moves From Proposed Schedule 7 to Schedule 9

The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing initially proposed creating a Schedule 7 Dangerous Poison entry for 6-methylnicotine.

Following consideration by the Advisory Committee on Medicines Scheduling, the regulator ultimately confirmed an interim decision to place the substance in the more restrictive Schedule 9 category.

TGA cited acute toxicity, use in unapproved consumer products, misleading “nicotine-free” marketing and the risk of dependence, particularly among vulnerable populations.

The regulator said there are no identified therapeutic benefits for 6-methylnicotine and no lawful products currently available in Australia that would be affected by the decision.

TGA said Schedule 7 would not provide sufficient controls, while Schedule 9 offers a stronger legal framework for action against unlawful supply and possession, including higher penalties under Commonwealth and state or territory drug laws.

Study Found 6-Methylnicotine in All Nine Vape Products Tested

The regulatory decision follows earlier Australian research into products marketed as nicotine alternatives.

A 2024 study published in the Medical Journal of Australia analysed nine e-cigarette products purchased in Australia in November 2023 from three manufacturers. The samples included four concentrated solutions for dilution and five ready-to-use disposable devices or pod cartridges.

Products carried descriptions including “nicotine derivative,” “nicotine alternative agent,” “no-nicotine nicotine solution” and claims of a nicotine-like experience without nicotine.

Laboratory testing found 6-methylnicotine in all nine products.

Two concentrates labelled as equivalent to 100 mg/mL nicotine contained about 31.4 mg/mL and 20 mg/mL of 6-methylnicotine. Of two products labelled as 10% solutions, one contained about 100 mg/mL and the other about 57 mg/mL.

Brand names were not disclosed in the published study.

Routine Nicotine Analysis Did Not Identify the Compound

Researchers said the ingredient in all nine products was not identified by the routine analytical testing they used for nicotine.

They subsequently used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify and fully characterise it as 6-methylnicotine.

The study cited laboratory evidence indicating that 6-methylnicotine has higher affinity for some nicotinic cholinergic receptors than nicotine and referenced earlier research reporting psychotropic potency around three times that of nicotine.

Researchers also said data on long-term inhalation and human health effects remain limited.

TGA Considered 163 Initial Public Submissions

TGA said it considered 163 public submissions during the pre-meeting consultation, nine of which included a written component.

One further submission was received during consultation on the interim decision and supported the stronger Schedule 9 classification.

The final decision confirmed the interim position and set an implementation date of October 1.

Schedule 9 Decision Targets the Substance Itself

Australia had already tightened separate product-level controls on vaping goods and nicotine pouches before the latest decision.

Non-therapeutic vapes cannot be supplied through ordinary retail channels, while regulated therapeutic vaping goods remain available through pharmacies under applicable requirements.

Australia tightened nicotine pouch regulation again in July 2026. From July 24, consumers can no longer import nicotine pouches under the Personal Importation Scheme or access unapproved pouches through the Special Access Scheme, Authorised Prescriber Scheme or pharmacist compounding pathways. TGA says there is now no lawful pathway for consumers to buy or import nicotine pouches in Australia.

The latest decision does not target a particular vape or pouch brand. It schedules 6-methylnicotine itself as a prohibited substance.

TGA's final notice does not identify specific vape brands, oral pouch brands or manufacturers linked to the substance.

From October 1, unlawful supply and possession of 6-methylnicotine will be subject to the stronger legal controls associated with Schedule 9 under Commonwealth and state or territory drug laws.

Follow 2Firsts for updates on global vape, nicotine pouch and novel nicotine-analogue regulation.

Cover Image: Therapeutic Goods Administration

Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
The Trump administration is preparing changes intended to accelerate FDA market authorization reviews for e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches, according to The Wall Street Journal. The FDA is expected to revisit its 2021 PMTA rule and may simplify some scientific study requirements and shorten review times. The agency has not formally announced the changes. Over the past year, the FDA has already accelerated nicotine-pouch reviews, expanded ENDS authorizations and upgraded its CTP Portal NextGen application system. As of August 2026, 43 nicotine pouch products and 48 e-cigarette products had received FDA marketing authorization.
Sep.24
FDA Unifies Tobacco Registration and Product Listing Form Across Product Categories
FDA Unifies Tobacco Registration and Product Listing Form Across Product Categories
The U.S. FDA has consolidated two tobacco establishment registration and product listing forms into a redesigned Form FDA 3741 covering all regulated product categories, including e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products and nicotine pouches. The current requirements remain limited to domestic establishments. Separately, the FDA has proposed extending registration and product listing requirements to foreign manufacturers, signaling greater regulatory attention to manufacturing entities and product-level information across the tobacco and nicotine supply chain.
FDA
Sep.30
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products is reshaping how it approaches tobacco product review. Based on 2Firsts’ on-site reporting in New York and Washington, this report traces CTP’s emerging direction: stronger links between PMTA and tobacco harm reduction, more category-specific review, greater emphasis on decision-relevant science, more predictable timelines and expanded use of sPMTA for product modifications. CTP also acknowledged major constraints, including just nine PMTA review teams, persistent backlogs and limits on hiring capacity.
Regulations
Oct.08
German Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 10.8% Through August as Tax-Paid Cigarette Volume Drops 12.6%
German Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 10.8% Through August as Tax-Paid Cigarette Volume Drops 12.6%
Germany collected €9.789 billion in total tobacco tax revenue from January through August 2026, down 10.8% from a year earlier, according to the Federal Ministry of Finance. Germany's tobacco tax base covers not only cigarettes and fine-cut tobacco but also heated tobacco and vaping liquids taxed as tobacco substitutes. The German Association of the Tobacco Industry and Novel Products, or BVTE, citing federal statistical data, said tax-paid cigarette volume fell 12.6% to 40.6 billion sticks. BVTE is using the latest figures to argue against further tax increases planned from 2027 through 2030, while Germany's parliament is scheduled to hold a first reading of the bill on September 24.
Sep.23
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
NAS 2026 | Former FDA Tobacco Chief Mitch Zeller Calls for Shift From “End Game” to “End State”
NAS 2026 | Former FDA Tobacco Chief Mitch Zeller Calls for Shift From “End Game” to “End State”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, former FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Mitch Zeller called for the tobacco harm reduction debate to shift from the traditional “end game” toward defining a desired “end state.” He also highlighted unresolved concerns around dual use, argued that biomarkers of exposure may be more meaningful than cigarettes-per-day in assessing risk reduction, and said nicotine misperceptions remain a major barrier to public health progress.
Sep.25