Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul

Regulations
Dec.21.2025
Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
An exclusive 2Firsts investigation found an unpublished FDA update on e-cigarette marketing authorizations that mirrors market speculation, suggesting Glas’s application may have cleared internal review, though no official confirmation has been issued.

Key Points:

  • A screenshot circulating on X suggests that Glas may have received FDA marketing authorization for one e-cigarette device and five pods, though no official announcement has been made.

 

  • 2Firsts identified a December 2025–dated e-cigarette authorization list on the FDA website, but the products are not yet listed in the FDA’s searchable database and some links remain inaccessible.

 

  • If confirmed, this would be the first new FDA e-cigarette authorization since Juul in July 2025, potentially signaling a faster pace in PMTA decision-making.

 

2Firsts, December 21, 2025, Shenzhen-2Firsts observed in the early hours of December 21, 2025 (Beijing time) that X user Gregory Conley posted a screenshot indicating that one device and five e-cigarette pods produced by e-cigarette brand Glas had received Marketing Granted Orders (MGOs) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
A post shared by X user Gregory Conley|Image Source:X

 

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
A list circulating online showing Glas products purportedly receiving marketing authorization | Source: social media

 

 

In subsequent verification efforts, 2Firsts identified a file on the FDA website labeled as an “e-cigarette authorization list” updated in December 2025, the contents of which appear highly consistent with the screenshot shared on X. However, the Glas products referenced have not yet appeared in the FDA’s official Searchable Tobacco Products Database, and some related file links are currently inaccessible, leaving the authorization status unconfirmed by formal FDA announcement.

If officially confirmed, this would mark the first new FDA e-cigarette authorization since Juul products received MGOs in July 2025, and may coincide with signs of shifting momentum in the FDA’s PMTA review process.

 

 

FDA Database Does Not Yet List Glas Products

 

Following the disclosure on X, 2Firsts promptly checked the FDA’s Searchable Tobacco Products Database. As of publication, no e-cigarette products associated with Glas are listed in the database.

 

The database continues to show 39 authorized e-cigarette products in total, with the most recent confirmed authorization granted to Juul in July 2025.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
2Firsts searched the FDA’s official database and found no Glas products listed

 

 

FDA File Status Appears Irregular; “December Update” List Not Formally Published

 

According to the FDA document link provided by the X user (https://www.fda.gov/media/190229/download), 2Firsts found that the page is no longer accessible and returns a “Page Not Found” error, preventing direct verification of the file via that link.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
FDA file numbered 190229 could not be accessed

 

 

In further searches, 2Firsts used Google to search for ““Glas Inc.” CTP-250” and found search results indicating that a PDF file hosted on the FDA website contains references to products including “Glas Inc. BLONDE TOBACCO 50 MG/ML Pod,” “CLASSIC MENTHOL 50 MG/ML Pod,” and “FRESH,” though the file itself could not be opened.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
Google search results indicate that a PDF file hosted on the FDA website contains references to Glas

 

 

By following the FDA’s typical public document numbering patterns, 2Firsts identified a neighboring link (https://www.fda.gov/media/190230/download), which leads to a low-resolution image file titled “Authorized-E-Cigarettes-List.jpg.” While the image is blurred and lacks full clarity, its layout and visible entries appear consistent with the screenshot circulated on X, and the list includes “Glas Inc.” and associated products.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
2Firsts identified a file numbered 190230 on the FDA website which, though blurred, appears consistent with the authorization document circulating online | Source: FDA website

 

 

Possible Indication FDA Review Is Complete, Pending Formal Announcement

 

Based on these observations, one possible explanation is that the FDA has completed its internal review and authorization process for Glas-related e-cigarette products and uploaded an updated authorization list internally, but that the document has not yet entered the formal public release process or was temporarily removed during publication. Technical or caching factors may have resulted in a residual image version remaining accessible on the server.

 

As of now, the FDA has not issued any public statement regarding the status of the file or the authorization of Glas products.

 

 

If Confirmed, Authorization May Signal Regulatory Shift on Flavor and Age Verification

 

According to the circulating authorization list screenshot, Glas’s approved products appear to include at least one flavor that, based on its name, does not fall under traditional tobacco or menthol categories.

 

Previous media reports have indicated that Glas’s PMTA strategy centered on its proprietary age-restriction or age-verification platform, designed to address FDA concerns regarding youth access. If the authorization is ultimately confirmed, this could represent the first FDA-approved e-cigarette products combining age-verification technology with non-traditional flavors—an outcome that could be viewed as a significant regulatory development in the U.S. e-cigarette market.

 

 

Signs of Accelerating PMTA Review Pace

 

On December 19, 2025 (U.S. Eastern Time), the FDA announced that it had granted marketing authorization to certain on! PLUS nicotine pouch products under Altria.

 

If Glas’s e-cigarette authorization is confirmed, it would further reinforce market perceptions that the FDA is accelerating PMTA decision-making across both e-cigarette and nicotine pouch categories.

 

2Firsts has submitted an interview request to the FDA regarding the authorization status of Glas’s e-cigarette products and the apparent publication and removal of related documents. No response had been received as of publication.

 

2Firsts will continue to monitor and report on developments in U.S. PMTA reviews and regulatory policy.


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
According to SGST on August 26, 2026, Australia’s Coalition Illegal Tobacco Taskforce released a report recommending an up to 80% cut in tobacco excise to reduce the appeal of the illicit tobacco market. The report claimed organised crime groups now control about 80% of Australia’s tobacco market and argued that high excise rates have widened the price gap between legal and illegal products. The recommendation remains a policy proposal and has not been adopted by the Australian government, which said its focus remains on enforcement, compliance and additional resources.
Aug.27
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Attorney General Stephen J. Cox has sent notices to more than 1,500 tobacco retailers and distributors warning them against selling vape and nicotine pouch products that lack authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the Alaska Department of Law, businesses were advised to verify products against FDA authorization databases and avoid selling unauthorized nicotine products. The action highlights how state-level enforcement is increasingly extending federal product authorization requirements to retail channels.
Jul.24
Iowa Enforces Vape Registry Law as Retailers Warn Product Limits Could Increase Store Pressure
Iowa Enforces Vape Registry Law as Retailers Warn Product Limits Could Increase Store Pressure
Iowa has begun enforcing its vape registry law, requiring vape products to be registered before they can be legally sold in the state. The move follows a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to lift an injunction that had blocked enforcement. Retailers have warned that tighter product availability rules could increase pressure on vape shops. One Iowa retailer said that if only a limited number of products remain available, many stores could face significant business challenges.
Aug.06
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
According to Interfax-Ukraine, a study conducted by market research firm Kantar Ukraine at the request of major tobacco companies found that more than 93% of vape products in Ukraine did not fully comply with regulatory requirements. The research examined product categories, brand distribution and consumer purchasing channels, showing that pod systems and disposable vapes represent major segments of the market, while offline retail remains the dominant purchasing channel. The findings highlight ongoing compliance challenges in Ukraine’s vape market.
Aug.26