Italy Formally Submits Detailed Opinion to EU Obstructing Ireland's Disposable Vape Ban

Apr.10
Italy's Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy has submitted a detailed opinion against Ireland's proposed "Public Health (Single Use Vapes) Bill 2025." Italy argued that the comprehensive ban on disposable vapes lacks scientific evidence, violates the EU principle of the free movement of goods, and conflicts with the existing Tobacco Products Directive.

Key Takeaways

  •  According to a European Commission document, the standstill period for Ireland's bill banning disposable vapes has been formally extended to June 19, 2026.
  • Italy's Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy submitted a detailed opinion to the EU on March 19, 2026, opposing Ireland's "Public Health (Single Use Vapes) Bill 2025."
  • The Irish bill intends to prohibit the retail sale of disposable vaping devices nationwide, regardless of whether they contain nicotine.
  • Italy pointed out that Ireland's total ban constitutes a quantitative restriction, violating the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) principle of free movement of goods.

 

2Firsts, April 10, 2026 

 

According to the European Commission, the EU's Technical Regulations Information System published a detailed opinion from Italy regarding Ireland's "Public Health (Single Use Vapes) Bill 2025." The bill originally planned to completely ban the retail sale of disposable vapes in Ireland.

 

Ban standstill period extended to June 2026

 

Under EU Directive 2015/1535, due to the submission of this detailed opinion by Italy, the standstill period for the Irish bill has been formally extended to June 19, 2026. During this period, Ireland may not adopt or implement the legislation.

 

Ireland notified the EU of the draft on December 18, 2025. The draft plans to completely ban the retail sale of any non-reusable vaping device, regardless of whether it contains nicotine. 

 

Italy's Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy submitted the formal objection to the European Commission on March 19, 2026.

 

Italy alleges ban violates EU principle of free movement of goods

 

In its detailed opinion, Italy explicitly stated that the Irish bill lacks scientific evidence and exceeds the existing EU regulatory framework. 

 

The ban constitutes a quantitative restriction under Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), preventing products legally manufactured and sold in other EU member states from entering the Irish market, thereby violating the core principle of the free movement of goods.

 

At the same time, Italy argued that the measure is incompatible with Article 24 of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (2014/40/EU - TPD). 

 

The provision stipulates that member states can only ban specific categories of products under exceptional circumstances justified by the need to protect public health. Italy pointed out that Ireland failed to provide appropriate documentation proving the existence of such exceptional circumstances.

 

Lack of proportionality and alternative considerations

 

In its analysis of proportionality, Italy emphasised that Ireland's comprehensive ban failed to adequately assess less restrictive alternatives before restricting trade. 

 

For example, Ireland could have adopted stricter age control measures, targeted information campaigns, or differentiated taxation tools, rather than directly implementing a sales ban.

 

Furthermore, the ban was cited as undermining the "freedom of establishment" (Article 49 of TFEU) of legitimate EU operators already present or intending to operate in Ireland, raising risks of unequal treatment in market access and the fragmentation of EU regulations.

 

Image Source: European Commission

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Special Report|U.S.-Facing Retailer Lists RELX Creator Pro 15K: A Chinese Brand Signal Under FDA’s Lower-Priority Enforcement Window
Special Report|U.S.-Facing Retailer Lists RELX Creator Pro 15K: A Chinese Brand Signal Under FDA’s Lower-Priority Enforcement Window
Vapesourcing has listed RELX Creator Pro 15K as “Coming Soon” with U.S. warehouse shipping options; while the page does not show that RELX has entered the U.S. market through official channels or that the product has received FDA authorization, the listing suggests that Chinese brand-led ENDS products are becoming a new point of observation as the U.S. market reassesses regulatory risk following the FDA’s updated enforcement-priority policy.
Industry Insight
Jun.11
From Brands to Supply Chains: 2Firsts Builds a PMTA Compliance Service System for the U.S. Market
From Brands to Supply Chains: 2Firsts Builds a PMTA Compliance Service System for the U.S. Market
2Firsts supports new tobacco and nicotine companies entering the U.S. market with full-chain PMTA compliance services.
Jun.04
North Carolina Adds $1,000 Vape Shop Tax and 21+ Age Verification Requirement
North Carolina Adds $1,000 Vape Shop Tax and 21+ Age Verification Requirement
North Carolina’s new state budget introduces additional vape retail regulations, including a $1,000 tax on vape shops and mandatory age verification requiring customers to be at least 21.
Jul.08
Australia’s Daily Smoking Rate Falls to Record Low of 5.8% as Nicotine Use Patterns Shift
Australia’s Daily Smoking Rate Falls to Record Low of 5.8% as Nicotine Use Patterns Shift
According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s National Drug Strategy Household Survey, daily smoking among Australians aged 18 and over fell to a record low of 5.8% in 2025. Health Minister Mark Butler said Australia now has around 500,000 fewer daily smokers than three years ago and credited the government’s vaping reforms as part of broader progress. Among people aged 14 and over, daily smoking declined from 8.3% in 2022-23 to 5.6% in 2025. Daily vaping rates stabilised at 3.6%, while the government also moved to further restrict access to nicotine pouches through unapproved therapeutic import pathways.
Jul.21
Special Report|South Korean Lawmaker Queries China Tobacco Regulator Over Synthetic Nicotine as Export-Rule Gaps Emerge
Special Report|South Korean Lawmaker Queries China Tobacco Regulator Over Synthetic Nicotine as Export-Rule Gaps Emerge
A South Korean lawmaker has asked China’s tobacco regulator to clarify rules for e-cigarettes containing synthetic nicotine amid questions over product declarations and possible tax losses. The dispute exposes gaps between Chinese export requirements and destination-market rules, while underscoring the global impact of China’s licensing and traceability policies.
Jul.10
Italian Court Ends Six-Year Cigarette Excise Dispute, Rejecting Damages Claim
Italian Court Ends Six-Year Cigarette Excise Dispute, Rejecting Damages Claim
Italy’s Lazio Regional Administrative Court has dismissed an appeal by Italian Tobacco Manufacturing and Manifattura Italiana Tabacco over the cigarette excise calculation mechanism, upholding the minimum tax burden rules and excluding compensation for smaller tobacco operators.
News
Jun.26 by 2Firsts Perspectives