NJOY Sues FDA Over Delayed Ruling on Flavored Disposable Vapes

Aug.24.2025
NJOY Sues FDA Over Delayed Ruling on Flavored Disposable Vapes
Altria’s subsidiary NJOY has sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), alleging prolonged delays in ruling on its appeal for flavored disposable vapes. NJOY argues the products are identical to authorized versions and backed by scientific data and safeguards, yet the review has taken far beyond statutory limits, blocking lawful products while illicit ones flood the market.

Key Points

 

Lawsuit Filed

  • NJOY (Altria subsidiary) and Louisiana retailers filed suit on Aug. 21, 2025, in the Western District of Louisiana.

 

Defendants Named

  • FDA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), FDA Commissioner Martin Makary, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Acting CTP Director Bret Koplow.

 

Case Background

  • FDA denied flavored NJOY DAILY PMTAs in June 2022 but approved tobacco and later menthol variants; the appeal has been pending for nearly three years.

 

Evidence Submitted

  • Longitudinal cohort study (3,600+ adults) showing higher switching for flavored products;
  • Youth perception studies;
  • Strict age-verification and sales restrictions;
  • FDA staff assessments supporting NJOY’s data.

 

Main Allegations

  • Inconsistent standards, disregard of evidence, refusal to weigh safeguards, excessive delay, and market imbalance favoring illicit products.

 


 

 

[2Firsts, August 24, 2025] NJOY, LLC, a subsidiary of Altria, together with several Louisiana-based distributors and retailers, filed a lawsuit on August 21 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette Division. The defendants include the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), as well as FDA Commissioner Martin Makary, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Acting Director of FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) Bret Koplow.

 

The plaintiffs allege that the FDA has failed to act on NJOY’s supervisory appeal concerning its flavored disposable vape products, leaving the matter unresolved for nearly three years. According to NJOY, this delay has kept lawful products out of the market while illicit flavored disposables have flourished across the United States.

 

 

Case Background

 

 

In March 2020, NJOY submitted eight PMTAs for NJOY DAILY products, including two tobacco, two menthol, and four flavored variants: Blue + Black Berry 4.5%, EXTRA Blue + Black Berry 6%, Watermelon 4.5%, and Tropical Twist 4.5%.

 

In June 2022, the FDA granted marketing orders for the tobacco variant (and later for menthol) but denied the flavored applications. NJOY stressed that these products are identical in design and composition to the authorized versions, differing only in flavor. The company filed a supervisory appeal in October 2022, which remains undecided to date.

 

NJOY Sues FDA Over Delayed Ruling on Flavored Disposable Vapes
Case Information | Screenshot from justia.com

 

 

NJOY’s Evidence

 

 

To support its applications and appeal, NJOY submitted a broad package of scientific evidence and market restrictions:

 

  • Longitudinal Cohort Study: Followed over 3,600 adult DAILY users, showing that about one in five achieved complete switching after three months. Flavored variants demonstrated higher switching rates than tobacco and menthol.

 

  • Switching Rate Data: The three flavored variants showed 40–113% higher complete switching at three months and 29–68% higher at six months compared to tobacco/menthol.

 

  • Youth Studies: Among 1,000 adolescents aged 13–17, use of NJOY products showed no statistically significant increase; in a perception survey of 3,000+ teens, overall interest was low with only minor differences between flavors.

 

  • Market Restrictions: NJOY committed to selling only through licensed retailers, enforcing strict online and offline age-verification, and implementing additional sales and reporting limits.

 

  • Internal FDA Documents: Obtained via FOIA, internal assessments from FDA’s Office of Health Communication and epidemiology staff concluded that NJOY’s restrictions exceeded prior benchmarks and that flavored variants were associated with higher switching rates.

 

 

NJOY’s Main Allegations Against FDA

 

 

According to the complaint, NJOY argues that FDA’s handling of its applications and appeal is flawed in several key respects:

 

  • Inconsistent Standards: Tobacco and menthol products were authorized, while compositionally identical flavored products were denied.

 

  • Disregard of Evidence: FDA failed to give due weight to NJOY’s longitudinal data and youth-specific studies.

 

  • Rejection of Safeguards: NJOY’s stringent marketing and age-verification measures were not meaningfully considered.

 

  • Procedural Delay: The supervisory appeal has been pending since October 2022, effectively creating a “de facto flavor ban.”

 

  • Market Imbalance: Lawful products remain sidelined, while illicit flavored disposables dominate U.S. retail.

 

NJOY also underscored the severe imbalance in timing. Under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, FDA is expected to act on PMTAs within 180 days. Instead, NJOY’s flavored applications were denied only after 802 days4.5 times the statutory period. Even more striking, its supervisory appeal has now been pending for 1,003 days, or 5.6 times longer than the statutory timeframe. NJOY contends that a review based on the existing record, typically involving only internal coordination and administrative file review, should not take longer than the initial PMTA assessment.

 

 

NJOY–FDA Key Timeline of Interactions

 

 

  • 2020-03-30: NJOY submits eight DAILY PMTAs, including four flavored variants.
  • 2020-12-17: FDA issues deficiency letter, asking for stronger evidence on flavored variants.
  • 2021-03-04: NJOY responds, providing six-month longitudinal data.
  • 2022-06-10: FDA issues MDOs for flavored products; grants MGO for tobacco variant.
  • 2022-10-17: NJOY files supervisory appeal.
  • 2022-11-07: Then-CTP Director Brian King accepts the appeal and delegates to Shawn Fultz.
  • 2023-01-11: NJOY holds virtual meeting with FDA/CTP; no substantive outcome.
  • 2024-01-17, 2025-04-22, 2025-07-30: NJOY sends three follow-up letters urging resolution; no response.
  • 2025-05: Bret Koplow appointed Acting Director of CTP.
  • 2025-08-21: Lawsuit formally filed in the Western District of Louisiana.

 

NJOY Sues FDA Over Delayed Ruling on Flavored Disposable Vapes

 

 

NJOY’s Requested Relief

 

 

The plaintiffs ask the court to declare FDA’s delay unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act, to compel the agency via injunction or writ of mandamus to issue a prompt decision on the supervisory appeal, and to award costs and attorney’s fees while retaining jurisdiction for oversight.

 

2Firsts will continue to closely follow this case and provide timely updates.

 

Cover image generated by ChatGPT

U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
On July 23, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes Section 707 provisions requiring the Department of Defense to evaluate tobacco use and nicotine alternatives among military personnel. The pilot program would examine products including vapes, nicotine pouches and heated tobacco products, primarily among active-duty service members who continue using combustible tobacco. The provision is a policy evaluation effort, not an authorization for military vaping promotion or a ban on vape products.
Jul.28
Australia’s TGA Places Nicotine Pouches Under Therapeutic Goods Rules From July 24, Blocking Imports of Unapproved Products
Australia’s TGA Places Nicotine Pouches Under Therapeutic Goods Rules From July 24, Blocking Imports of Unapproved Products
Australia is strengthening controls on nicotine pouches under its existing therapeutic goods regulatory framework. According to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), nicotine pouch products must meet regulatory requirements, and unapproved products cannot be legally imported. The move follows Australia’s broader approach of maintaining strict oversight of nicotine products, including nicotine-containing vapes. As nicotine pouches expand globally, Australia’s regulatory approach highlights growing differences in how countries manage emerging smoke-free nicotine products.
Regulations
Jul.27
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
A new Swedish study found oral mucosal lesions in 79% of examined nicotine pouch users and 89% of tobacco-derived snus users, with different tissue-response patterns between the two categories. For manufacturers and regulators, the findings shift attention toward product formulation, flavouring, pouch materials and local oral exposure, not only whether a product contains tobacco. The study found no higher prevalence of caries or periodontal disease, but it could not establish causality, long-term outcomes or differences between individual products or designs.
Special Report
Jul.27
IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
Philip Morris International’s IQOS has entered the Kantar BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands for the first time, ranking No. 74 with a brand value of $36.634 billion and becoming one of only three newcomers to the 2026 ranking. Kantar said the combined value of the Global Top 100 reached $13.1 trillion, up 22% year on year, while the threshold for entry rose to a record high. PMI says IQOS has more than 35 million users worldwide and surpassed $10 billion in annual net revenues within a decade of launch.
Sep.03
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19