Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”

Feb.03
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
A group of vape distributors and retailers has sued to block enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes selling or marketing vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Commerce Secretary. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the U.S. Constitution because only Congress may regulate foreign commerce.

Key Points

 

  • Plaintiffs: ECIGRUSA LLC (Worldwide Vape Distribution), Addison Vapor LLC, AF Vapor LLC, Smoke Scene Lubbock LLC.
  • Defendant: Texas acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock.
  • Challenged law: Provision in SB 2024, signed in July 2025 and effective Sept. 1, 2025.
  • Ban scope: E-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in “foreign adversary” countries (including Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia).
  • Claims: Foreign Commerce Clause preemption, facial discrimination, and First Amendment concerns related to advertising.
  • Alleged impact: Insufficient 70-day transition period, stranded inventory, customer losses, and enforcement/prosecution risk.

 


 

2Firsts, Feb. 3, 2026

 

Law360 reports that a group of vape distributors and retailers has filed suit seeking to block Texas from enforcing a new law that makes it a crime to sell or market vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce.

 

The plaintiffs sued Texas acting Comptroller of Public Accounts Kelly Hancock, arguing that the Foreign Commerce Clause reserves regulation of trade with foreign nations to Congress alone. 

 

They contend the state measure risks conflicts and undermines the federal government’s ability to “speak with one voice” in foreign commercial affairs.

 

The lawsuit targets a provision of Senate Bill 2024, signed into law in July 2025 and effective Sept. 1, 2025. Under the provision, it is a crime to sell or market a vape product containing e-liquid made in whole or in part in China or in a country designated as a foreign adversary, including Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Russia.

 

Plaintiffs include ECIGRUSA LLC (Worldwide Vape Distribution), Addison Vapor LLC (Artisan Vapor & CBD Addison), AF Vapor LLC (Artisan Vapor & CBD Dallas), and Smoke Scene Lubbock LLC. 

 

They argue that the 70-day window between signing and the effective date was not enough time to overhaul supplier networks, leaving them with hundreds of thousands of dollars in pre-law inventory they can no longer sell. They also claim they have already lost customers and faced enforcement actions.

 

The complaint further argues that e-liquids contain numerous ingredients, making it difficult—sometimes impossible—to verify the origin of every component; under the statute’s plain language, even one ingredient from a prohibited country could trigger criminal liability. 

 

The plaintiffs also allege the law is facially discriminatory and raises First Amendment concerns by criminalizing advertising based on factual representations, while not banning other foreign-made tobacco products.

 

The case is ECIGRUSA LLC et al. v. Hancock, No. 3:26-cv-00254, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

 

Image source: Law360

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters reported on July 13, 2026, that India is seeking to dismiss Adani Airports’ legal challenge over nicotine pouch sales at Mumbai International Airport’s duty-free shops. Adani denies wrongdoing and argues that existing drug and cosmetics regulations do not apply to duty-free sales or nicotine pouches.
Innovation
Jul.14 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
UK consumer goods group Supreme said its vaping revenue rose 15% to £148.1 million in the year to March 31, 2026, despite the UK disposable vape ban taking effect during the period, while the company identified the Vaping Products Duty due in October as the next major industry milestone.
Regulations
Jul.03 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Reuters: Shopify May Ban All Vape Sales This Week Amid Illegal Market Crackdown
Reuters: Shopify May Ban All Vape Sales This Week Amid Illegal Market Crackdown
Reuters reported that Shopify may ban all vape products from its platform as soon as this week, signaling that U.S. enforcement against the illegal vape market is expanding from retailers and importers to e-commerce platforms and payment networks.
MarketBAT
Jun.23 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Attorney General Stephen J. Cox has sent notices to more than 1,500 tobacco retailers and distributors warning them against selling vape and nicotine pouch products that lack authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the Alaska Department of Law, businesses were advised to verify products against FDA authorization databases and avoid selling unauthorized nicotine products. The action highlights how state-level enforcement is increasingly extending federal product authorization requirements to retail channels.
Jul.24
Canada Vape Enforcement Action Puts VAPME Website, Trademark and China Supply-Chain Links in Focus
Canada Vape Enforcement Action Puts VAPME Website, Trademark and China Supply-Chain Links in Focus
Quebec police seized about 300,000 suspected illegal vape products and froze more than C$1.8 million in funds. Local media said vapme.ca, a website selling flavoured vape products, was shut down during the operation.
Regulations
Jun.18
Malaysia Police Seize RM12.7 Million in Illegal Vapes and Cigarettes as Probe Points to Sea Shipments From China
Malaysia Police Seize RM12.7 Million in Illegal Vapes and Cigarettes as Probe Points to Sea Shipments From China
Police in Malaysia’s Selangor state seized illegal vape products and contraband cigarettes worth about RM12.7 million (approximately $3 million) in two enforcement operations. According to New Straits Times and The Star, the vape-related operation uncovered 131,036 boxes of vape products, 4,900 bottles of e-liquid and 25,510 vape devices, valued at about RM9.4 million. Police said preliminary investigations indicated that some illegal vape products entered Malaysia through sea shipments from China before moving through storage and distribution networks.
Aug.10